Leprosy Mailing List – March 22, 2021
Ref.: (LML) Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis wit single-dose rifampicin (LPEP): an international feasibility programme.
From: Pieter AM Schreuder, Maastricht, the Netherlands
Dear colleagues,
Last week, Henk Eggens sent me the following 3 publications from Lancet Glob Health:
1.Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis wit single-dose rifampicin (LPEP): an international feasibility programme. By Prof. Jan Hendrik Richardus, Anuj Tiwari, Tanja Barth-Jaeggi, Mohammed A Arif, Nand Lal Banstola, Rabindra Baskota, et al. Lancet Glob Health 2021; 9: e81–90Published Online October 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30396-X
Findings: Between Jan 1, 2015, and Aug 1, 2019, LPEP enrolled 9170 index patients and listed 179 769 contacts, of whom 174 782 (97·2%) were successfully traced and screened. Of those screened, 22 854 (13·1%) were excluded from SDR mainly because of health reasons and age. Among those excluded, 810 were confirmed as new patients (46 per 10 000 contacts screened). Among the eligible screened contacts, 1182 (0·7%) refused prophylactic treatment with SDR. Overall, SDR was administered to 151 928 (86·9%) screened contacts. No serious adverse events were reported.
Interpretation: Post-exposure prophylaxis with SDR is safe; can be integrated into different leprosy control programmes with minimal additional efforts once contact tracing has been established; and is generally well accepted by index patients, their contacts, and health-care workers. The programme has also invigorated local leprosy control through the availability of a prophylactic intervention; therefore, we recommend rolling out SDR in all settings where contact tracing and screening have been established.
May I also point to the publication from authors of Erasmus University and NLR, the Netherlands, we referred to in LML, March 7, 2021:
Number of people requiring post-exposure prophylaxis to end leprosy: A modeling study https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009146
2. Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis risks not adequately assessed. By Diana Lockwood, et al. www.thelancet.com/lancetgh Vol 9 April 2021e400
A reaction to the publication Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin (LPEP): an international feasibility programme by Prof. Jan Hendrik Richardus, et al (see point 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30396-X).
3. Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis risks not adequately assessed. Authors (Jan Hendrik Richardus) reply to the comments made by Diana Lockwood et al (see 2).
In this letter we will publish first the reaction from Diana Lockwood et al to the article Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis wit single-dose rifampicin (LPEP): an international feasibility programme and tomorrow the authors reply.
Best wishes,
Pieter AM Schreuder
www.thelancet.com/lancetgh Vol 9 April 2021e400
Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis risks not adequately assessed.
We thank Jan Richardus and colleagues for their feasibility study of single-dose rifampicin for contacts of individuals diagnosed with leprosy.(1) Single-dose rifampicin was incorporated into the WHO Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Leprosy as a conditional recommendation based on moderate evidence.(2) The roadmap for neglected tropical diseases 2021–30 targets leprosy for elimination (interruption of transmission) with single-dose rifampicin as a "core strategic intervention".(3) We have raised our concerns about single-dose rifampicin previously.(4)
Richardus and colleagues acknowledge that single-dose rifampicin's 57% protective effect only lasts for 2 years, and contacts of those with multibacillary disease only have 24% protection.(1) Individuals receiving single-dose rifampicin need to understand the temporary and limited effect against leprosy. The Article has insufficient detail to determine whether fully informed consent of the participants was obtained in all centres. Brazilians were reportedly told, "There is leprosy in your area, and that is why we offer people preventive treatment against leprosy "when being informed about the Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis (LPEP) study, without indicating the temporary and partial effect of single-dose rifampicin.(5)
The definition of contacts in this study differed from that in the COLEP cluster randomised controlled trial in Bangladesh.(6) In Richardus and colleagues' study, contacts were given single-dose rifampicin up to 2 years after diagnosis of the index case; whereas, in the COLEP study, single-dose rifampicin was given to contacts of newly diagnosed index cases.(6)The paediatric proportion of index leprosy cases was high in India (31·3%) and Nepal (28·7%), compared with reported national rates of 6·8% and 7·6%, respectively.(7) The high proportion of cases in children resulted in a lower proportion of multibacillary cases (28·9%) in India than the national rate of 54·2%.(7) These unusual leprosy cohorts and the variation in the selection of contacts mean that the results are not generalisable. The main outcome measure was the number of single-dose rifampicin given. No evaluation of the effect of this intervention on leprosy rates is planned.
WHO advises that tuberculosis needs to be excluded in patients before administering single-dose rifampicin to reduce the risk of producing rifampicin-resistant M tuberculosis strains.(2) Screening individuals for tuberculosis using clinical symptoms before administering single-dose rifampicin lacks sensitivity. Only one Indian participant (of 42333 screened) was excluded on a suspicion of tuberculosis in a state with a reported incidence rate of 194 per 100000 in 2019.(8) This low exclusion rate suggests that some leprosy control programmes cannot effectively screen for tuberculosis. The widespread use of single-dose rifampicin might promote the development of Mycobacterium leprae rifampicin resistance. The risk of M tuberculosis developing rifampicin resistance has not been assessed rigorously, it was deemed to be negligible by an expert group convened by the Novartis foundation and the LPEP group, without a systematic review. The authors extrapolate their interpretation of the risk of M tuberculosis resistance data to M leprae, but this is not described.(9) WHO have recommended multidrug therapy for patients with leprosy since 1982, to reduce the risk of rifampicin resistance.(10) The presence of M leprae rifampicin resistance genes has already been detected.(11) Dispensing millions of doses of single-dose rifampicin might jeopardise the effectiveness of the key antibacterial component of leprosy multidrug therapy. This policy recommendation undermines the global strategy to combat antimicrobial resistance.
Richardus and colleagues' study shows that with active case finding, many people with leprosy are found and at rates greater than the reported national statistics.(7) The Brazilian Ministry of Health, following wide consultation, has decided not to implement single-dose rifampicin because of lack of evidence for its efficacy.(12) Brazil has the second highest case numbers globally and was an LPEP study site. the diagnosis and management of people with leprosy should be prioritised rather than the short-lived, partial efficacy of single-dose rifampicin for contacts. WHO should review their recommendation to implement this intervention and the Global Leprosy Programme and other advocates of single-dose rifampicin should ensure robust mechanisms are in place to detect adverse effects of this policy.
All authors declare no competing interests. Copyright © 2021 The Author(s).
Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
*Diana N J Lockwood, Barbara de Barros, Edessa Negera, Heitor Gonçalves, Roderick J Hay, Indira P Kahawita, Rajni Kant Singh, Bhushan Kumar, Saba M Lambert, Vivek Pai, Gerson O Penna, Geoff Prescott, Guilllermo Robert de Arquer, Sinesio Talhari, Aparna Srikantam, Stephen L Walker.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK (DNJL, BdB, EN, SML, SLW); Dona Libania Dermatology Center, Fortaleza-Ceara, Brazil (HG); King's College London, London, UK (RJH); Nawaloka Hospital, Sri Lanka (IPK); LEPRA India, Patna, Bihar, India (RKS); Shalby Hospital, SAS Nagar, Punjab, India (BK); Bombay Leprosy Project, Mumbai, India(VP); Tropical Medicine Centre Universidade de Brasilia (GOP), Fiocruz School of Government (GOP), Brasilia Federal District, Brazil; LEPRA UK, Colchester, UK(GP, GRdA); Fundacao de Dermatologia tropica e venereologia Alfredo da Matta, Manaus, Brazil(ST); LEPRA Blue Peter Public Health and Research Centre, Hydedrabad, India (AS)
Correspondencee401www.thelancet.com/lancetgh Vol 9 April 20211
1. Richardus JH, Tiwari A, Barth-Jaeggi T, et al. Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin (LPEP): an international feasibility programme. Lancet Glob Health2021; 9: e81–90.
2. WHO. Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of Leprosy. New Delhi: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, 2018.
3. WHO. Ending the neglected to attain the sustainable development goals: a roadmap for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2020.
4. Lockwood DNJ, Krishnamurthy P, Kumar B, Penna G. Single-dose rifampicin chemoprophylaxis protects those who need it least and is not a cost-effective intervention. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018; 12: e0006403
5. Schoenmakers A, Mieras L, Budiawan T, van Brakel WH. the state of affairs in post-exposure leprosy prevention: a descriptive meta-analysis on immuno- and chemo-prophylaxis. Res Rep Trop Med 2020; 11: 97–117.
6. Moet FJ, Pahan D, Oskam L, Richardus JH. Effectiveness of single dose rifampicin in preventing leprosy in close contacts of patients with newly diagnosed leprosy: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008; 336: 761–64.
7. WHO. Global leprosy (Hansen disease) update, 2019: time to step-up prevention initiatives. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2020; 95: 417–40.
8. TBFacts. TB statistics India. https://tbfacts.org/tb-statistics-india/ (accessed Nov 24, 2020).
9. Mieras L, Anthony R, van Brakel W, et al. Negligible risk of inducing resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with single-dose rifampicin as post-exposure prophylaxis for leprosy. Infect Dis Poverty 2016; 5: 46.
10. WHO. Chemotherapy of leprosy for control programmes. Tech Rep Ser 675. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 1982.
11. Cambau E, Saunderson P, Matsuoka M, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in leprosy: results of the first prospective open survey conducted by a WHO surveillance network for the period 2009–15. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018;24: 1305–10.
12. Exclusão da rifampicina para quimioprofilaxia de contatos de pacientes com hanseníase. Brasilia: Ministério da Saúde, 2020. http://conitec.gov.br/images/Relatorios/2020/Relatorio_Rifampicina_Quimioprofilaxia_Hansenase_525_2020_FINAL.pdf (accessed Nov 24, 2020)
LML - S Deepak, B Naafs, S Noto and P Schreuder
LML blog link: http://leprosymailinglist.blogspot.it/
Contact: Dr Pieter Schreuder << editorlml@gmail.com
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Leprosy Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leprosymailinglist+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leprosymailinglist/995e9ab2-114a-4b70-abb3-7f77b525405cn%40googlegroups.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.